Research papers of the week – September 30, 2024

Mackay Price; Bradley S. Simpson; Benjamin J. Tscharke; Fahad Ahmed; Emma L. Keller; Hannah Sussex; Melanie Kah; Katarzyna Siła-Nowicka; Andrew Chappell; Cobus Gerber; Sam Trowsdale

Science of the Total Environment

Ministerial score = 200.0
Journal Impact Factor (2023) = 8.2 (Q1)

Knowledge of the number of people present in a catchment is fundamental for the assessment of spatio-temporal trends in wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE). Accurately estimating the number of people connected to wastewater catchments is challenging however, because populations are dynamic. Methods used to estimate population size can significantly influence the calculation and interpretation of population-normalised wastewater data (PNWD). This paper systematically reviews the reporting of population data in 339 WBE studies. Studies were evaluated based on their reporting of population size, the source of population data, the population calculation methods, and the uncertainties in population estimates. Most papers reported population size (96 %) and the source of population data (60 %). Fewer studies reported the uncertainties in their population data (50 %) and the methods used to calculate these estimates (28 %). This is relevant because different methods have unique strengths and limitations which can affect the accuracy of PNWD. Only 64 studies (19 %) reported all four components of population data. The reporting of population data has remained consistent in the past decade. Based on the findings, we recommend generalised reporting criteria for population data in WBE. As WBE is further mainstreamed and applied, the clear and comprehensive reporting of population data will only become increasingly important.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176076

READ THE PAPER UPWr Base