Research papers of the week – August 29, 2022

Comparison of Volatile Profiles of Meads and Related Unifloral Honeys: Traceability Markers

Piotr Kuś, Sławomir Czabaj, Igor Jerković
Molecules

Ministerial score = 140.0
Journal Impact Factor (2022) = 4.927 (Q2)

molecules.jpgVolatile profiles of unifloral honeys and meads prepared in different ways (boiled-saturated, not boiled-unsaturated) were investigated by headspace solid-phase micro extraction (HS-SPME) and dehydration homogeneous liquid–liquid extraction (DHLLE) followed by GC-FID/MS analyses. The obtained data were analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) to evaluate the differences between the investigated products. The volatile profiles of honey as well as the boiled and the not boiled meads prepared from it showed significant discrepancies. The meads contained more aliphatic acids and esters but fewer monoterpenes and aliphatic hydrocarbons than the honey. Significant/substantial differences were found between the boiled (more aliphatic alcohols and acids) and the not boiled meads (more aliphatic hydrocarbons and esters). Some compounds related to yeast metabolism, such as tryptophol, may be considered markers of honey fermentation. This research allowed us to identify chemical markers of botanical origin, retained and detectable in the meads: 4-isopropenylcyclohexa-1,3-diene-1-carboxylic acid and 4-(1-hydroxy-2-propanyl)cyclohexa-1,3-diene-1-carboxylic acid for linden; valeric acid, γ-valerolactone, p-hydroxybenzoic acid for buckwheat; 4-hydroxybenzeneacetic acid, homovanillic acid and trans-coniferyl alcohol for honeydew; and methyl syringate for canola

DOI:10.3390/molecules27144558

READ THE PAPER UPWr Base


magnacarta-logo.jpg eua-logo.png hr_logo.png logo.png eugreen_logo_simple.jpg iroica-logo.png bic_logo.png